2026-03-30 04:45 UTC
A society should always prioritize its weaker members. Children are among these. The flexibility given to the parents is not a gift to the parents, but to the children.
Replies (4)
-
@orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-03-30 04:52
Why not both? I chose not to have kids because I think this world is idiotic and don’t want more unnecessary suffering.
-
@IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 2026-03-30 05:17
Regrettably, this focused flexibility has an unintended side effect. It makes people with children less desirable in the job market. If it is a universal right, then it has the effect of pulling those with kids into parity with the non parents.
-
@jaybone@lemmy.zip 2026-03-30 06:05
Good thing our benevolent overlords grant us such gracious “gifts” 👌🏼🍆
-
@SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2026-03-30 14:54
Some people dont have children, but look after grandparents, or a chronically ill or handicapped person, or they take on a lot of responsibilities in the community. Its very rare and not normal for people not to be involved in their community.