#loudlynotunderstandingthings

3 posts · Last used 1d

Replying to on dotnet.social
6/6 So remember, the "M" for multiplication in the mnemonics (BEDMAS, PEMDAS, whatever) refers LITERALLY to multiply signs. If there's no multiply sign, then it's NOT "multiplication", it's a Term. If there's a bracketed term which has a coefficient, then the coefficient has to be distributed, and that's part of solving Brackets/obeying The Distributive Law. Anyone who says anything different to that is just #LoudlyNotUnderstandingThings #MathsIsNeverAmbiguous #DontForgetDistribution
0
10
0
0
Replying to
3/7 I've even seen one say (of calculators) "sometimes it obeys (IM), sometimes it doesn't". That's because the calculator in question obeys Terms but NOT TDL, and it's behaviour is 100% consistent with that (but confusing to someone who has lumped them together as IM). They even went as far as claiming "PEMDAS is wrong", cos they were treating it like rules (whilst also #LoudlyNotUnderstandingThings like the actual rules TDL and Terms), and made up a new mnemonic, so let's look at mnemonics...
0
5
0
0
Replying to
@bemmesr@mathstodon.xyz "I'd suggest you read https://math.berkeley.edu/~wu/order5.pdf as it essentially makes the same argument I'm making" - and is contradicted by Maths textbooks and proofs. 🙄 Note the complete lack of textbook references "perhaps with more clarity and conviction" - #LoudlyNotUnderstandingThings "It's not an uncommon idea" - the idea of Earth being flat used to not be an uncommon idea "this has turned out to be somewhat of a research task" - you could've just read my thread in the first place 🙄
0
5
0
0
You've seen all posts